Finance
New Delhi: A police case has been filed against three members of a crowdfunded fact-finding team of the Editors’ Guild of India, who went to Manipur to look into the media’s reportage of the ethnic conflict, over allegations that the report submitted by the team was “false, fabricated and sponsored”.
The Editors’ Guild of India (EGI) in the report released on Saturday said there are clear indications that the leadership of the state became partisan during the conflict. “It should have avoided taking sides in the ethnic conflict, but it failed to do its duty as a democratic government which should have represented the entire state,” the report said among its several observations in a concluding summary.
Imphal-based social worker N Sarat Singh filed the first information report (FIR) against the three who came to Manipur from August 7 to 10 – Seema Guha, Sanjay Kapoor, and Bharat Bhushan. The EGI president has also been mentioned as an accused in the FIR.
The FIR states the EGI report captioned the photo of a burning building in Churachandpur district as a “Kuki house”.
The building, however, was a Forest Department beat office that was set on fire by a mob on May 3, the day large-scale violence broke out in the district, 65 km from the state capital Imphal, following a protest by the hill-majority Kuki tribes against the valley-majority Meiteis over the Meiteis’ demand for Scheduled Tribes (ST) status.
An FIR filed on May 3 evening by a policeman, sub-inspector Jangkholal Kipgen, said “a large number of angry crowd” damaged the Forest Department beat office with “fire or explosive substances”.
The EGI yesterday in a post on X, formerly Twitter, accepted the error in its report and said it is “being rectified and an updated report will be uploaded shortly.” “… We regret the error that crept in at the photo editing stage,” the EGI said.
The EGI report alleged the Manipur government branded all Kuki tribes as “illegal immigrants” after some 4,000 refugees fleeing the military coup in neighbouring Myanmar crossed into Manipur. The EGI in the report faulted the state government for taking a series of steps that led to resentment among the Chin-Kukis to build up. “The state government seems to have facilitated the majority’s anger against the Kukis through several seemingly partisan statements and policy measures,” the report said.
The social worker in the FIR, however, alleged the EGI report has not mentioned key facts about large-scale illegal immigration to Manipur that threatens the indigenous people with a demographic change.
N Sarat Singh stated in the FIR, “The abnormal decadal population growth of up to 169 percent is evident in Manipur, as the Census of 2001 has not been finalized for the nine hills subdivision of the state.”
“He said, ‘Recently, the Election Commission of India identified 1,33,553 photo similar entries in Manipur’s electoral roll,’ adding steps are being taken to delete duplicate voters. ‘… It is very alarming, and it proves the fact that there are various unaccounted populations existing in Manipur having illegally come from neighboring countries, including Myanmar,’ said the social worker in the FIR.”
The EGI report faulted Imphal valley-based media as being biased in favour of the Meitei community.
“The Meitei media, for that is what Manipur media seemed to have become during the conflict, acted collectively with editors consulting each other and agreeing on a common narrative… This, the EGI team was told, was because they did not want to inflame the already volatile situation further… However, the downside of such an approach during ethnic violence is that it can easily slip into forging a common ethnic narrative and lead to a collective downslide of journalistic principles by deciding what to report and what to censor,” the EGI report said in its concluding remarks.
Responding to the allegation, the All Manipur Working Journalists Union, and the Editors’ Guild Manipur said they have taken strong exception to the “half-baked so-called fact-finding report, which was completed in merely four days.”
“The report has many contentions and wrong representations which are damaging to the reputation of the journalist community in the state, especially Imphal-based news outlets,” the Manipur journalists’ collective and the Manipur Editors’ Guild said in the statement.
The three journalists came to Manipur on a crowd-funded visit to prepare the report. The EGI on July 26 posted on X, asking for donation to fund “a fact-finding mission to document media’s coverage of the Manipur ethnic clashes.”
“Help us pay for this important exercise for self accountability and reflection on press’ conduct. Contribute for expenses of the mission,” the EGI said in the post.
Government sources informed NDTV that they are contemplating an investigation into the sources of donations received by the three-member EGI team. Crowdfunding such a sensitive endeavor may have been an ill-advised move, given the potential for influence from donors with vested interests.
The EGI is yet to give a statement on the FIR.
